The University Star

Token black speakers do not excuse TPUSA’s hypocrisy

Temi Ikudayisi

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

With the wave of social vocalism, specifically by or on behalf of minorities, the illusion of diversity is important for every organization to maintain a favorable public perception. Diversity statistics are often highlighted to prove faux inclusivity, otherwise known as tokenism.

Oxford Dictionary defines tokenism as “the practice of making only a perfunctory or symbolic effort to do a particular thing, especially by recruiting a small number of people from underrepresented groups in order to give the appearance of sexual or racial equality within a workforce.”

In other words, tokenism stems from a misguided attempt to portray diversity, simply by giving the appearance of equality without actually achieving it. A common example of this is a person who attempts to excuse their racist behavior with the age-old argument, ‘My best friend is black.’ Another example is the individual who thinks sitting in the proximity of a homosexual couple without spewing homophobic epithets makes them an ally of the LGBTQIA community.

Recently, Texas State’s chapter of Turning Point USA, TPUSA, a right-wing student organization, was called out by Student Government’s Director of Diversity Outreach Eli Miller for perpetuating this false sense of inclusivity to make itself appear up on their diversity quota while not addressing issues affecting minorities.

TPUSA promoted itself as a Second Amendment-loving organization and welcoming students who did not want their right to carry arms infringed upon.

A student rebutted that the notion of the Second Amendment was created by the same people who enforced the enslavement of African-Americans, and therefore might be an outdated concept worth reconsideration.

Senator Miller added that the scope of the Second Amendment and its avid supporters tends fall short of the African American community, noting the murder of Philando Castile, a legal gun owner who disclosed he was licensed and carrying a weapon to police before they shot him, as an example of Second Amendment rights not applying to black people

TPUSA responded to criticism of their selectivity in advocating for gun rights by promoting Antonia Okafor, an African-American woman pro-Second Amendment speaker it had arranged to visit campus this semester.

This is a prime example of how tokenism operates. TPUSA is happy to parade a woman of color as a testament to the diversity of supporters who share their beliefs but remain utterly silent when that same demographic falls victim to a violation of the rights they so staunchly support. If the Second Amendment is the right of all Americans, it should be applied equally.

Similarly, NRATV, the news outlet for the National Rifle Association, aired a prerecorded interview with Atlanta rapper Killer Mike. Killer Mike is known for his revolutionary and conscious brand of alternative rap. His social activism includes advocating for economic equality and the need to dismantle the two-party system. The NRA, has never shown an ounce of interest or concern regarding the gun ownership rights of black people. But they utilized this interview with an African-American man speaking about minorities in this country and their gun rights to disparage the recent wave of anti-gun protests following the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting and March for Our Lives.

Diversity is meant to pull ideas, perspectives and strengths from a wide variety of communities. Tokenism will always remain an empty movement with no real impact beyond causing confusion and frustration. It allows a false sense of achievement. Putting one black face in front of 100 white ones is not diversity. It is not inclusion. It’s abusing and misusing minority existence to support stances that actively work against their safety. Empty visual politics cannot be considered action.

– Temi Ikudayisi is a public relations senior

About the Writer
1 Comment

One Response to “Token black speakers do not excuse TPUSA’s hypocrisy”

  1. James Regan on April 29th, 2018 7:23 pm

    So much for tolerance. You shame this young lady because of her race and political beliefs because it fits your agenda…you know the talking points, conservatives are rich old white males. Out of the other end of your mouth you yell for tolerance. This is the second time in less than a year your newspaper has had racists writing articles. No wonder I hit delete on all those diversity emails about inclusiveness. You people (young people) need to understand that you are here to get an education, not protest every five minutes about your little cupcake feelings. Put on you adult pants and go to class. Maybe if you did, you wouldn’t have time to write garbage like this. Your article just motivated my money to go into TPUSA’s coffers.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act states that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider" (47 U.S.C. § 230). This means The University Star is protected as a platform and cannot be held liable for user-submitted comments. Additionally, The University Star retains CDA immunity while editors reserve the right to take down comments for any reason. Editors also reserve the right to refuse to take down comments that are not profane or libelous. By submitting comments to The University Star, commenters agree they have read and understand this policy.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.

Defending the First Amendment since 1911
Token black speakers do not excuse TPUSA’s hypocrisy