The University Star

San Marcos City Council will not join lawsuit against immigration law

%3Cem%3ESan+Marcos+residents+voice+their+concerns+on+SB+4+at+the+city+council+meeting+Aug.+15+at+City+Hall.%3C%2Fem%3E%3Cstrong%3EPhoto+by+%3Ca+href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fstar.txstate.edu%2Fauthor%2Fbri-watkins%2F%22%3EBri+Watkins%3C%2Fa%3E%3C%2Fstrong%3E
Back to Article
Back to Article

San Marcos City Council will not join lawsuit against immigration law

San Marcos residents voice their concerns on SB 4 at the city council meeting Aug. 15 at City Hall.Photo by Bri Watkins

San Marcos residents voice their concerns on SB 4 at the city council meeting Aug. 15 at City Hall.Photo by Bri Watkins

San Marcos residents voice their concerns on SB 4 at the city council meeting Aug. 15 at City Hall.Photo by Bri Watkins

San Marcos residents voice their concerns on SB 4 at the city council meeting Aug. 15 at City Hall.Photo by Bri Watkins

Denise Cervantes

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






After a three hour executive session, the San Marcos City Council gave a statement Aug. 15 announcing it will not be joining the lawsuit alongside Austin, Houston, Dallas and San Antonio against Senate Bill 4.

SB 4, also known as the “sanctuary cities” bill, would allow law enforcement officials to ask the immigration status of those they arrest or detain.

Mayor John Thomaides read the statement regarding city council’s position on the bill, which was unanimously approved.

“City council is directing the staff to monitor the pending litigation to let the decision of U.S. district judge Orlando Garcia guide the city’s future actions in regards to SB 4,” Thomaides read. “City council further believes that immigration is a federal government responsibility.”

During the Tuesday evening meeting, City Hall was filled with activists and protestors holding up signs and wearing white in solidarity of protecting undocumented immigrants.

San Marcos families showed support for undocumented immigrants at the city council meeting Tuesday evening.

During public commentary, Jordan Buckley, San Marcos resident, said city council needs to assess the racial dynamics in the San Marcos community.

“This body has been all white minus one for far too long, and I think if there’s not been a clear moment to recognize the need for single member districts then you guys have embodied that by waiting three months to find the importance of this issue being addressed,” Buckley said. “It’s taken you three months and sixteen days to address the most severe anti-immigrant and discriminatory law takes effect in our town, and today is the day that we bring it up. I ask you that if this body composition reflected that of our community, would we have had to wait three months to have this conversation?”

In the city council’s statement, Thomaides said the council’s time to take a stance on SB 4 was not due to “a lack of care or concern for their residents.”

“The San Marcos City Council hereby expresses concerns of the effects of SB 4 on our entire community and will initiate additional community outreach and communication with our police and other city departments to maintain and improve trust and ensure health, mental health, safety, and welfare of all residents, their families and children and students of our community.” Thomaides read in the statement.

Karen Muñoz and Jordan Buckley vocalized their concern Aug. 15 for the immigration law set to take place Sept. 1.

Mano Amiga SMTX responded to City Council’s decision through a statement expressing their disdain.

“Council insists they will now educate the immigrant community, but it’s Council that needs the education. They used lies and distortion to justify their spineless decision, insultingly employing thoroughly disproven arguments and a spectacularly rare legal interpretation that, would you believe it, enable them to sit on the sidelines while Texas cities all around us rise to this moral crisis by taking a stand for immigrants and people of color in their communities,” a part of the post stated.

SB 4 will go into effect Sept. 1.

About the Writer
Leave a Comment

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act states that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider" (47 U.S.C. § 230). This means The University Star is protected as a platform and cannot be held liable for user-submitted comments. Additionally, The University Star retains CDA immunity while editors reserve the right to take down comments for any reason. Editors also reserve the right to refuse to take down comments that are not profane or libelous. By submitting comments to The University Star, commenters agree they have read and understand this policy.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • San Marcos City Council will not join lawsuit against immigration law

    Breaking

    Texas State students sit-in

  • San Marcos City Council will not join lawsuit against immigration law

    Breaking

    Students hold sit-in following yesterday’s arrests

  • San Marcos City Council will not join lawsuit against immigration law

    Breaking

    Four students arrested following on-campus clash

  • San Marcos City Council will not join lawsuit against immigration law

    Latest

    Float Fest drifts to Gonzales

  • San Marcos City Council will not join lawsuit against immigration law

    In Brief

    Man arrested after watching female students sleep, tied to burglaries throughout San Marcos

Navigate Right
Defending the First Amendment since 1911
San Marcos City Council will not join lawsuit against immigration law