The University Star

The controversial “bathroom bill” advances to the House

%3Cstrong%3EPhoto+by+%3Ca+href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fstar.txstate.edu%2Fauthor%2Fshayan-faradineh%2F%22%3E+Shayan+Faradineh%3C%2Fa%3E+%7C+Managing+Editor+%3C%2Fstrong%3E
Back to Article
Back to Article

The controversial “bathroom bill” advances to the House

Photo by  Shayan Faradineh | Managing Editor

Photo by Shayan Faradineh | Managing Editor

Photo by Shayan Faradineh | Managing Editor

Photo by Shayan Faradineh | Managing Editor

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






After 10 hours of committee hearings and eight hours debating on the Senate floor, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick lead senators to pass the controversial “bathroom bill” in a 21-10 vote after midnight Wednesday morning.

The bill regulates bathroom use for the transgender community. The vote was along party lines, with one democrat, Sen. Eddie Lucio Jr., D-Brownsville, voting in favor of the bill.

Senate Bill 3, filed by Sen. Lois Kolkhorst R-Brenham, requires that bathroom use in schools and other government buildings are to be based off the gender assigned on a birth certificate or other forum of ID. The bill would make it illegal for the transgender community to use the bathroom in which they identify with.

The policy has been a priority for Patrick, who has been very public on his views.

“This issue is so clear and simple that it defies belief,” Patrick said outside of his office in April. “Do they really want a man walking into a restroom with their daughter or mother or wife?  Have we gone too far in the world of political correctness that we’ve forgotten common sense, common decency.”

The bill now goes to the House, where Speaker Joe Straus, R-San Antonio, has historically voiced opposition toward the legislation.

In the final days of the regular session, Straus voiced the harmful effects the regulation would have on Texas’ economy.

“We will go no further,” Straus said in a press conference May 26. “This is the right thing to do in order to protect our economy from billions of dollars in losses and more importantly to protect the safety of some very vulnerable young Texans.”

It is unclear when the House will address this legislative policy, as they’re still discussing prospects of the “sunset legislation” bills passed by the Senate on July 19.

About the Writer
Leave a Comment

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act states that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider" (47 U.S.C. § 230). This means The University Star is protected as a platform and cannot be held liable for user-submitted comments. Additionally, The University Star retains CDA immunity while editors reserve the right to take down comments for any reason. Editors also reserve the right to refuse to take down comments that are not profane or libelous. By submitting comments to The University Star, commenters agree they have read and understand this policy.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • The controversial “bathroom bill” advances to the House

    Hays County

    Animal shelter finds homes for seized animals, looks for volunteers

  • The controversial “bathroom bill” advances to the House

    Hays County

    Hays County approves voting precinct changes

  • The controversial “bathroom bill” advances to the House

    Hays County

    Texas State forms alliance to save endangered toad species

  • The controversial “bathroom bill” advances to the House

    Hays County

    Hays County Commissioners Court takes action against pipeline

  • The controversial “bathroom bill” advances to the House

    Hays County

    Float Fest is back on, following venue change

Navigate Right
Defending the First Amendment since 1911
The controversial “bathroom bill” advances to the House